top of page
Writer's pictureMahya Darbandsari

How Do Virtual PLCs Untangle Spaghetti Architecture in Operational Technology?

Unlock the potential of next-generation automation by simplifying your automation architecture using virtual PLCs.


Industrial automation is undergoing a revolution, but many facilities are held back by what's best described as "spaghetti architecture", a tangled web of integrations, customizations, and outdated point-to-point connections. Built on the foundations of Industry 3.0, these systems are struggling to keep pace with the demands of Industry 4.0.


By moving control logic to virtual PLCs (Programmable Logic Controllers), facilities can modernize their architecture, reduce system interdependencies, and prepare for a seamless digital transformation. This article explores how virtual PLCs and a Unified Namespace (UNS) can reshape your operations, eliminate bottlenecks, and future-proof your automation strategy.

OTee virtual PLC architecture with Unified Namespace principle

Understanding the Symptoms of Overly Complex Architectures in Industrial Automation


Spaghetti architecture describes the unstructured and overly complex integration of systems in industrial operations. Over the years, facilities have added new devices, gateways, and applications to their systems. Each addition required custom configurations and point-to-point integrations, leading to:

  • Increased maintenance costs due to fragile connections.

  • Limited scalability when adding new devices or functionalities.

  • Data silos that prevent seamless information flow.

  • High vulnerability to downtime from interdependent failures.

Older plants, with years of upgrades and customizations, may feel this strain more acutely than newer facilities. Yet, even modern facilities will eventually face similar challenges if they continue down the path of complex, ad-hoc integrations. Addressing these limitations is critical to sustaining growth and innovation as businesses progress in their digital transformation journeys.


Why Legacy Complexity is a Problem for Digital Transformation


Understanding the Current Situation

Many industrial facilities today operate on an Industry 3.0 framework, where isolated systems run independently and communicate via multiple custom point-to-point connections. There's nothing to be ashamed of—after all, it's the product of natural evolution, and it somewhat works. As new applications, gateways, and devices were added to address specific needs, each was integrated into the existing infrastructure. However, every addition required more connections and more customization, leading to an unsustainable level of complexity. For example, adding a new AI application to a legacy architecture might involve extensive reconfigurations across numerous interdependent systems.

Over time, the sheer volume of these point-to-point connections becomes a hurdle:

  • Maintenance Challenges: Each system must be connected individually, creating a latticework of interdependencies that can be difficult to troubleshoot.

  • Upgrade Difficulties: Upgrading one system often requires changes in others, making the process cumbersome.

  • Limited Scalability: Adding new functionalities becomes increasingly impractical due to the intricate web of connections.


A New Approach: Rethinking Operational Data Frameworks from the Bottom Up


Virtualizing the PLC Layer

The limitations of conventional architectures can be overcome with a structured data integration approach that addresses complexity at the foundational level. Rather than continuing to build layers onto existing systems, we recommend modernizing from the ground up by focusing on the Programmable Logic Controller (PLC) layer, which is central to every facility's operation.

The PLC serves as the gateway between machinery and digital control systems, making it the ideal place to start transforming data architecture. Virtualizing the PLC function has profound implications for flexibility and scalability. Virtual PLCs can be scaled, updated, and configured centrally, eliminating many of the limitations imposed by physical hardware. By virtualizing the PLC layer, companies gain the ability to streamline and centralize control functions across multiple systems without needing custom integrations or complex configurations.

A virtual PLC framework also provides a flexible foundation for all other digital improvements, from predictive maintenance to machine learning. Connecting virtual PLCs to a central data hub allows all operational data to be published and consumed in a structured, human-readable format. This concept is known as a Unified Namespace (UNS), a centralized data framework where all data resides and can be easily accessed by any application that needs it. The virtual PLC-UNS combination forms a powerful, adaptable solution for companies looking to deliver on the promise of Industry 4.0 without the constraints of legacy configurations.


Four Key Benefits of Adopting Virtual PLCs and a Unified Data Architecture


1. A Technology-Driven Ecosystem

Adopting a central data hub shifts the focus from vendor-specific products to technology-driven solutions. In traditional architectures, choices are often tied to proprietary ecosystems, creating challenges like:

  • Limited Flexibility: Companies are locked into specific vendor technologies, reducing adaptability.

  • Hindered Innovation: Vendor constraints limit the adoption of advanced tools and methodologies.

A unified data framework changes the game by enabling open data flow. Facilities can choose technologies based on their technical merits, not vendor compatibility. 

For example, discussions around operational decisions shift from debates like "Product A vs. Product B" to more nuanced comparisons like "MQTT vs. OPC-UA" or "EtherNet/IP vs. EtherCAT."This flexibility creates a level playing field, where operational requirements dictate technology choices, enabling companies to build robust, future-proof solutions.


2. Security Built into the Data Fabric

As data flows become more open and interconnected, security concerns rise. Traditional OT security models often rely on network segmentation and perimeter defenses, which work well enough for isolated systems but are inadequate for modern, highly interconnected environments. Legacy setups are particularly vulnerable, as every new addition to the stack opens up potential vulnerabilities that perimeter defenses struggle to cover.

In contrast, a unified namespace architecture integrates security directly into the data framework, aligning with zero-trust principles:

  • Multi-Level Authentication: Every node (person, device, or application) must authenticate and authorize before accessing data.

  • Role-Based Access Control (RBAC): Permissions are assigned based on roles, restricting access while ensuring data flow remains seamless.

Furthermore, a unified namespace aligns well with Purdue Model security requirements, maintaining traditional OT protection while allowing for finer controls that respond to the evolving threat landscape. By embedding security within the framework itself, we can safeguard not only data integrity but also operational continuity, allowing facilities to innovate without compromising their defenses.


3. Enhanced Operational Visibility and Real-Time Insights

With data published to a centralized hub, operators and decision-makers gain unprecedented visibility into their operations. Real-time data from every system is accessible, not just at a single machine level but across the entire facility. This comprehensive view of operations enables more accurate decision-making, faster response times, and deeper insights into performance trends.

Moreover, a unified data architecture supports advanced analytical tools, including AI and machine learning, which rely on consistent, high-quality data to deliver actionable insights. With unified data from every device and application feeding into the same hub, predictive analytics becomes not only possible but also highly accurate, transforming maintenance schedules, optimizing workflows, and potentially reducing costs.


4. Streamlined Fleet Management and Upgrades

Legacy architectures struggle with scalability due to tightly coupled systems. Adding machines, expanding facilities, or upgrading firmware often requires:

  • Extensive Rework: Complex integrations demand significant time and resources.

  • Operational Disruptions: Upgrades risk downtime and data integrity issues.

Moreover, a unified data architecture supports advanced analytical tools, including AI and machine learning, which rely on consistent, high-quality data to deliver actionable insights. With unified data from every device and application feeding into the same hub, predictive analytics becomes not only possible but also highly accurate, transforming maintenance schedules, optimizing workflows, and potentially reducing costs.


Phased Approach to Implementing Virtual PLCs and unified namespace


Implementing a central data hub and virtual PLC functions doesn't require a costly or disruptive "rip and replace" strategy. Facilities can:

  1. Deploy the central data hub while maintaining existing systems.

  2. Enable new applications to consume data from the UNS without disturbing current operations.

  3. Gradually migrate applications to the new framework one by one.

This incremental approach reduces the risk of downtime, preserves existing investments, and allows companies to transition smoothly into a more scalable, flexible digital architecture.


Conclusion: Moving Forward with Virtual PLCs and Unified Data Architectures


The complex architecture prevalent in today’s industrial facilities is not inherently wrong, but it is reaching its practical limits. As the demands of present and future industrial operations become more pressing, facilities must evolve beyond point-to-point integrations toward structured, scalable solutions. At OTee, we believe that by focusing on and virtualizing the PLC layer and adopting a unified namespace approach, companies can reduce complexity, enhance security, and position themselves to take full advantage of modern industrial innovations.

By virtualizing the PLC function and connecting it to a central data hub, facilities can eliminate the need for custom integrations, gain real-time visibility, and set the stage for scalable growth. Importantly, this approach supports gradual migration, allowing companies to modernize at their own pace and maintain operational stability while making the transition.

Ultimately, modernizing data architectures isn’t just about simplifying integrations—it’s about unlocking new possibilities. A unified data framework empowers facilities to become more agile, adaptable, and resilient in the face of evolving industry demands. As the automation landscape continues to evolve, now is the time to embrace structured data architectures fed by virtual PLCs and build a future-ready foundation for Industry 4.0 and beyond.


Open to Exploring the Next Generation of Industrial Automation?


We understand the complexities of industrial automation and the challenges they bring. Virtual PLCs offer a straightforward way to untangle that complexity and bring the needed clarity to your operations, allowing you to focus on what truly matters: scalability, efficiency, and unlocking new opportunities for innovation.

Book a demo or sign up for early access if you’re curious to see how this works in practice. This will offer a hands-on perspective to help you assess its practical implications in your environment.


 

Relevant Links


49 views0 comments

Recent Posts

See All

Comments


bottom of page